When evaluating organizations, look for:
Common red flags because situations of crisis can attract oportunists and bad actors:
Evaluates charities based on financial health, accountability, and transparency. Most useful for larger, established organizations, primarily US based.
Independent humanitarian analysis focused on needs, gaps, and response quality. Helpful for checking whether claimed interventions align with real needs.
Radical transparency for community driven initiatives. Every expense is public and traceable.
Direct access to nonprofit tax filings and historical records. Less polished, highly transparent.
Evaluates how openly organizations publish data about their activities, locations, and results. Focuses on transparency rather than fundraising optics.
Tracks incidents affecting humanitarian workers. Provides indirect signals about field presence, risk exposure, and operational environments.
Official registry for charities in England and Wales, including trustees, finances, and compliance history.
Journalism focused on global development and humanitarian work. Useful for identifying controversies, failed interventions, and structural issues.